Resource Center

Advanced Search
Technical Papers
Working Papers
Research Memoranda
GTAP-L Mailing List
GTAP FAQs
Educational Materials
CGE Books/Articles
Important References
Submit New Resource

GTAP Resources: Resource Display

GTAP Resource #5123

"Simulation and Economic Impact Evaluation of Ukrainian Electricity Market Tariff Policy Shift"
by Chepeliev, Maksym


Abstract
Among all types of economic activities in Ukraine the power industry is the only one that utilizes cross subsidization mechanisms. Electricity tariffs for the residential consumers are set far below the estimated retail level, while industrial consumers have to pay higher prices in order to compensate for these costs. In 2012 electricity consumption subsidies exceeded 31 billion UAH, which is over 8,7% of Central government budget and 2,3% of Ukraine’s GDP.
In this study a static computable general equilibrium model with heterogeneous households is applied to investigate distributional and poverty-related effects of price reform in the electricity sector of Ukraine, considering 30%, 50% and 100% subsidies elimination. In addition, different compensating mechanisms for various households’ groups are studied.
The results indicate that essential positive effects from subsidies elimination – lower production costs, output gain and investment intensification are seen, mostly by industrial activities. The highest growth rates are observed for those industries that not only actively consume electricity but also energy intensive goods and services. Regardless of the nature of implemented compensation mechanisms, the decrease in cross-subsidization leads to investments growth: for some scenarios up to 18 billion UAH. At the same time, residential consumers suffer with poor households loosing relatively more than rich.
Results show that the most appropriate compensatory option is partial preservation of cross subsidization. This approach bears no additional burden on the Government budget and does not require significant regulatory changes. However, given the specific nature of this concept, it should be used only in the case of 30% subsidies reduction.
In general, key positive effects of cross-subsidization reduction come from the production costs decrease, manufacturing capacity rise and investments volumes increase in the real sector of Ukrainian economy.


Resource Details (Export Citation) GTAP Keywords
Category: Other CGE Application
Status: Published
By/In: Journal of Economy and Forecasting
Date: 2014
Version:
Created: Chepeliev, M. (5/4/2016)
Updated: Batta, G. (5/4/2016)
Visits: 183
- Calibration and parameter estimation
- Model validation
- Economic development
- Economic growth
- Domestic policy analysis
- Other data bases and data issues
- Common Wealth of Independent States


Attachments
If you have trouble accessing any of the attachments below due to disability, please contact the authors listed above.


Public Access
No documents have been attached.

Restricted Access
No documents have been attached.


Special Instructions
No instructions have been specified.


Comments (0 posted)
You must log in before entering comments.

No comments have been posted.